|
How to Get a Positive
Evaluation Without Really Trying
Boring Disclaimers: This document is
not to be printed anywhere other than the Hampshire Daily Jolt without
the express written consent of Lemmy Koopa. Lemmy Koopa is not responsible
for negative or lack of evaluations that result from attempting the following
techniques. Lemmy Koopa can be contacted via email.
Sections:
Introduction
Make a good first impression
Attend class often
and arrive on time
Keep in contact with
your professor
Participate in class
How to read
How to write
Do your work on time
Think quality, not
quantity
The oral presentation
Group work
Take care of yourself
Make a good last impression
Self-evaluations save
all
Conclusion
Introduction
Over my time here at Hampshire I have
been amazed at how some people have had serious trouble with their classes.
Many people find themselves getting poor evaluations or no evaluations,
or opt to drop courses. At the same time, I have had little trouble
passing my courses and even quickly completing my Division I exams.
What's more, I've hardly even been trying! Clearly many Hampshire
students don't know the secret of how to ensure academic success, but fortunately
your favorite demigod is here to help you out!
Below I have listed my tried and true
method for getting a positive evaluation for your classes. The basic
goal is to convince your professors that you have done more high quality
work than you really have, and it's easier than it sounds. My method
is divided into steps that are not in any particular order. It is
not necessary that you follow every single step, but the more steps you
follow the better off you'll be. Especially important steps will
be marked as such. If you follow these steps you should easily be
able to pass four courses each semester, without even trying!
Back to the top.
Make a good first
impression
It's a well-known fact that first impressions
are very powerful in how people perceive each other. They can be
changed, but you'll be in good shape if you start off on the right foot
with your professor. Make sure to arrive on time the first day of
class. You should plan to arrive ten minutes early if possible; this
way, you can arrive ten minutes late and still be on time. Try not
to look as though you were out drinking the previous night and just rolled
out of bed. Be sure to do the first assignment so that you can participate
in class during the second session... and if the professor asks any questions
during the first session, try your hand at them, you have nothing to lose.
Finally, put some extra effort into that first project of yours.
If your professor likes your first paper/film/duck, he may begin to assume
that your other projects will also be good.
Back to the top.
Attend class often
and arrive on time
One way to increase your chances of
getting a positive evaluation is to show that you're really interested
in the course, and what better way to do that than to consistantly show
up for class? If you manage to get there on time you're showing that
this class is really a priority for you. I know it's hard to get
to that 9:00 class before 9:30, but believe me, it will pay off.
If you have to be absent, tell your professor in advance or as soon after
the missed session as possible. This way he knows you weren't stoned
or something. Even so, try to keep your absences to a minimum, professors
do get suspicious.
Back to the top.
Keep in contact with
your professor
Very important. First, it's hard
for a professor to write an evaluation for someone they've never spoken
to and barely know. Second, anyone who would take the time to wait
a few minutes after class or, even better, go to office hours must really
be interested in the course. Make sure your professor knows what
you're up to. If you're going to do a project that's not quite like
the one assigned, be sure to go check it out. Try to run your projects
by your professor before the due date, even if they're unfinished; this
way you can get comments and improve. Remember, the best papers incorporate
what your professor has said because the professor can't be wrong if he's
writing your evaluation. You don't need to be buddy-buddy with your
professor, but never voice disagreement either. That won't help you
get a positive eval. If your professor suggests that you could go
down to the children's center to do some research, don't let on that you'd
rather stick a fork in your eyes. You still don't have to go down
there.
Back to the top.
Participate in class
Not only does participating show that
you're interested in the material, it shows that you did the assignments
and are prepared to discuss them. Try to offer at least one comment
during each session, this way your professor is likely to remember you
as participating at least occassionally. I find it's easier to participate
if you offer your comment very early during the sessions, perhaps even
first thing. Early comments do not need to go very deep into the
assignments, they could be observations or summaries; if you wait longer
into the class period the questions are likely to get more complicated
and difficult to respond to. Once I opened a session with an observation
about the assigned reading. This spurned a whole conversation and
at the end of class the professor thanked me for bringing that point up,
but it really wasn't hard at all.
If you didn't do the assignment of discussion,
don't give up hope! You won't be able to comment first, but if you
pay attention to the discussion you should be able to figure out something
you can toss in. You could say whether or not you agree with whatever
has just been said, and make up some reason why you feel this way.
Whether or not you participate, be sure to look alert. Falling asleep
does not look good, nor does carrying on side conversations. I like
to have a notebook in front of me and a pen in my hand even though I never
actually take notes. If possible I would avoid bringing sewing materials
and the like, as they make it look like you're not focused on the discussion.
Back to the top.
How to read
I do not consider myself a fast reader
in the least. Yet I find I still complete reading assignments considerably
faster than many other students here. This baffles me because reading
at a college that doesn't give tests is no sweat. Elsewhere you would
have to make sure you really understand everything and spend time taking
notes in order to prepare for exams, but at Hampshire your professor will
never know exactly what you learned from the readings. For those
of you who really want to learn from the reading assignments, you can do
your reading in more detail when you have the time, like when you've completed
your final papers or over breaks. For now, you really only need to
skim reading assignments and get the major points. It's not important
for your class that you understand all the details like the support for
each argument. Someone is sure to bring them up in class anyway and
then you'll know about them. If you're really rushed for time, you
could probably get away with just reading the introduction and conclusion.
Do try to read at least a little of each assignment so that you have something
you can say in class.
Only rarely will you really need to
read an assignment in detail, such as when you've been asked to do an oral
report on it. In that case you'll need to read the whole thing and
take notes and maybe even read it several times. I haven't figured
out a better way for this yet. Even so, like I said, this will happen
rarely, and so it's not worth trying to learn how to read faster just for
these. If you've been asked to write a response paper based on your
reading, you can still get a good short paper written based on just the
intro, conclusion, and previous topics in the class... but I'll discuss
writing
in more detail later on. Incidentally, if you're doing research for
a project you can really fly through the readings. Find a chapter
whose title looks promising, then skim each page for keywords related to
your topic and slow down to read when you find them. Be prepared
to start skimming again if what you find isn't useful.
Back to the top.
How to write
I believe every class at Hampshire requires
a certain amount of writing. You should have known this when you
applied, and so I'm going to assume you have at least some basic writing
skills down. This will not be a grammar lesson... but do make absolutely
sure your papers have good spelling and grammar. Nothing says rushed
like a paper filled with grammar errors, and you want your professor to
think you spent a lot of time on your paper, whether or not you actually
did. Try to type your papers too, even the short ones. They're
just neater and easier to read that way.
I have divided papers into two main
categories, research papers and reflective papers. Research papers
are the ones where you have to go out and do some research, then compile
it all into a coherent essay. Reflective papers may be "what do you
think about this", or may ask you to discuss papers that you've (supposely)
read for class and do not require outside research. Length does not
make a difference in terms of what kind of paper it is. In fact,
the only differences between a five-page research paper and a ten-page
research paper is the amount of sources you'll need and, of course, how
much you'll need to write. Likewise, for a long reflective paper
you'll just have to do more reflecting. The tactics involved remain
the same.
Research papers first. You want
to get started on these as soon as possible because you're going to be
waiting on materials from the library that could take over a week to reach
you. That means if you wait until two weeks before the due date to
request your resources, you may only have one week or less to read them
and write your paper. Remember that Hampshire's library is very small,
so don't expect your sources to be readily available to you. Even
if you're willing and able to go to the Five-College libraries, you still
want an early start to ensure that no one else grabs your materials.
But before you can find sources you need to pick your topic. This
will likely be framed for you by your professor; if you decide to go outside
that box or are unsure whether your topic is acceptable, talk to your professor
right away. Actually, you should talk to your professor even if you're
sure your topic is acceptable because he may name some good sources for
you. If he does, definitely go find them. By the way, if you're
unsure whether your topic is too broad, it probably is. You should
be worried about finding too few sources.
Once you've got your topic, you want
to find some sources. You can go to Hampshire's library online and
look around. Try doing a subject search for books first because if
you can find relevant books they'll keep you busy for awhile. I've
had more luck with finding journal articles, however. You'll need
to read the short journal descriptions to find one that looks relevant
to your topic. Once you do, enter some keywords and do a search.
When the results appear, check to see how many there are. If your
topic is not too broad and not too narrow, you should find enough sources
so that you could, if you wanted, read them all, but not so few sources
that there's not enough info. Five to fifteen sources is usually
a good number, too much more than that and you won't be able to sort through
all the information, fewer and you won't find enough. Just because
there are fifteen sources doesn't mean you need to read them all, by the
way, especially if you're just writing a five-page paper. Mess around
with your search words until you find enough sources. Get these sources
as soon as possible so you can move on to reading and writing.
Now that you have the sources, you will
unfortunately need to read them... but not straight through, goodness no!
You want to skim your references for stuff related to your topic.
You might look for the same words you used to do your online search.
Remember, many of the sources you find won't exclusively discuss your topic,
so you need to weed through and find the good parts. Once you've
read about three of your sources, you're ready to write some of your paper.
You can write an introductory paragraph, which will state what exactly
you're researching in as many sentences as possible, and a concluding paragraph,
which will state what you've learned or found, also in as many sentences
as possible. You could knock off a page or more with these two sections
if you're double spacing, which you probably should be. Between them
you want to draw out the relevant information from the sources you read.
If you're really good you'll have skimmed through those sources the same
day you're starting to write so that everything is fresh. That way
you'll get all the good info written out and will easily be able to put
in your parentheticals. Make sure to refer to your sources in a logical
order. You might write a paragraph on each source and, if you end
up having enough sources, vaguely refer to one in several paragraphs to
sort of tie everything together.
Depending on how long your paper is
supposed to be you could have finished a significant portion of it with
just the first three sources. The hardest part, forming the paper's
general structure, is now done. Every time you read a new source
you can add another paragraph or two to your paper in a sensible location.
When all your sources are done or your paper is long enough as it is, look
everything over to make sure there is some semblance of logic and order.
Soon enough your paper will be complete.
Reflective papers do not have the long
start-up process of having to find research. Nevertheless these can
be harder than research papers because you'll actually need to think, whereas
when researching you can pretty much spurt out information from your references
with a few words changed here and there so you're not plagiarizing.
If the reflective paper is based on some assigned readings you may want
to look at them again, especially if it's been awhile since you last saw
them or you never actually saw them or you were unaware of or confused
by some points raised in class.
You'll need to organize your argument.
What are you arguing for and how can this be supported? What you're
arguing for is your first paragraph, two if you're especially verbose,
and sets down your main topic with, perhaps, a summary of the related readings.
Each paragraph or so should represent a different piece of evidence for
your argument; how many paragraphs you'll need to write will depend on
how long the paper is supposed to be. If you're running short you
can try explain some counter-arguments (statements that contradict your
argument) and then examine why they cannot be correct. End the paper
by summing up your evidence and restating your main argument.
I find it is easiest to write reflective
papers that are five or less pages long all in one sitting. Take
some time to formulate your argument (this can be done while eating, getting
dressed, or even in class while looking as though you're listening), maybe
make an outline if you need a more cemented structure, and then sit down
when you have two hours or so free and just write. While you're writing,
don't stop to think, you should already have done all of that. If
you stop after each sentence to consider what you just wrote it will take
more than those two hours. Let your argument guide you, and just
keep going. If you've formed your argument well you should be finished
in no time. Longer papers are somewhat more annoying because you
probably won't be able to complete them in one sitting. When you
resume your paper read what you've written, figure out where you left off,
get yourself focused, and keep going.
Regardless of the type of paper you're
writing, make sure it is tailored to the assignment itself. If you're
writing an experiment proposal based on research, the introduction and
conclusion sections are pretty much the raw research paper while the methods
and results sections will be mostly reflective, based on what you learned
from your research. Your professor should make it clear what he expects
in your paper, but if he doesn't feel free to interrogate him.
Try to eliminate distractions while
you're writing your papers. Some people claim they can write well
while chatting on IM or listening to loud music, but I am skeptical.
At the very least if you're chatting or grooving to the beat you're typing
your paper more slowly and diverting some of your attention. If you
need music, try something light and quiet. Personally I like videogame
music with the volume turned down, but you'll do as you will. Make
sure to reread your paper in full after writing it to catch those nasty
lost sentences or arguing noun-verb pairs or those paragraphs that lack
a transition so that they seem out of place. It works best if you
wait at least a day between writing and editing, otherwise you may read
what you think you wrote rather than what you really wrote. Of course,
your ability to do this is dependant on your having finished writing the
paper at least a day before the due date. If you finished really
early, show your paper to your professor and get his comments. Try
to incorporate them into your paper, you can't go wrong with doing what
your professor says. You can show your paper to peers if you wish,
but keep in mind that they probably know just about as much as you and
not a whole lot more, or perhaps even less.
If you are considerably more artistically
inclined than myself, pretty cover pages are a nice touch to any paper.
They make it look like you care, not to mention attaching another sheet
of paper to your essay makes it look longer. Only do this if you
really are a good artist or graphic designer though. A bad picture
could backfire on you.
Back to the top.
Do your work on time
My DAD is this important! Professors
are likely to remember if you've handed in your projects late; suffice
it to say it leaves a bitter taste in their mouths come evaluation time.
Plus, if you're behind then your work will be necessarily rushed, and that
does show. I have two methods to help ensure that you do, in fact,
complete your projects on time.
One way to do this is to pretend that
the assignment is due earlier than it really is. For example, if
your final paper is due December 13, you might pretend it's really due
December 6. This way you will guide your progress such that you will
intend to finish by the 6th, but if you don't quite manage to do it you
still have a week left. However, this method only works if you really
believe, really strive towards the earlier deadline. It's not enough
to set the early deadline but continue to work towards the original deadline.
Also, the larger and more important the project is, the larger the difference
between the two deadlines should be. After all, a larger project
is more likely to be delayed, and you want to make extra sure your important
projects are done on time.
A second way to ensure you finish your
work on time is through a reward system. Most people won't like this
option, but it does work if you enforce it. In the reward system
you give yourself an assignment, say, to write five pages of your paper
by 5 PM. Then you set a reward for your having done so, like maybe
you get some ice cream. The idea, then, is that if you really want
that reward you'll get that work done on time. However, you really
have to enforce the system. If you don't get the assignment done,
you don't get the reward, not even if Saga has chocolate ice cream without
nuts. The reward can get more powerful depending on how important
it is that assignment gets done today. One time I must have really
been behind because I decided I could not check my email until I had written
a short paper. It's harsh, but that's why it works. I have
added two special clauses to my rule system. First, if the reward
is earned but can't be redeemed (say, Saga has no good ice cream), it can
be redeemed at any time in the future or swapped for a similar reward.
Second, if you realize that the assignment was too much because you worked
hard all day but still couldn't complete it, a reward may still be in order.
But be honest! If you didn't finish because you decided to go play
Mario Party 4 (though why you would is beyond me) then no reward for you.
These two methods can be used in conjunction
if you wish. They'll need to be tailored to your own needs, but before
long you should find a system that adequately motivates you, just in case
getting a positive evaluation isn't quite enough.
If you must hand in your project late,
make sure you let your professor know. Most professors are not pleased
to receive late work without an explanation. Even if you are absent
the day a project is due it is your responsibility to do what you can to
get that project submitted on time. Find a classmate to hand it in
for you, attach that paper to an email, or brave the outside air and hunt
down your professor's mailbox or office. Finally, if you hand in
a project late you'd better make sure it's high quality so that it doesn't
look as though you were partying every night.
By the way, most professors are not
opposed to receiving work early. Then they can pay special attention
to your project because they won't be buried under everyone else's.
Back to the top.
Think quality, not
quantity
So this one time I was supposed to write
a ten-page paper, but I only wrote six before I reached my conclusion.
Realizing that six is not quite in the ballpark of ten, I decided to consult
my professor. After reading my paper, my professor said, "This is
good." This, of course, is a normal reaction to my written work.
I responded, "Uh... I haven't even edited it yet." She said, "It's
good." While leaving I added, "Well, if you ever find anything you
want me to fix, you just let me know." That never happened.
This may be a rare example, but the
point is to not let yourself be constrained by length requirements.
When you are told to write a 15-page paper, think of that as a goal rather
than a restriction. As it is, many professors will simply tell you
to write until you're done. It's time-consuming to add pages just
to reach your quota, and since you'll probably just be rambling those pages
are not likely to improve the quality of your paper, they may even devalue
it by diluting your important information with repetitive stuff.
When you finish writing your paper, read it over and decide if it's comprehensive
and complete... and if so, don't worry about what page number you're up
to. If you're really worried you can speak to your professor, he
can give you some ideas. Or if you don't want to do that, you could
add some pictures or something. Or, better yet, make up for it in
your self-evaluation.
Back to the top.
The oral presentation
I used to dread these like the plague.
I'm still not especially fond of them as I prefer writing to speaking,
but they're not really a big deal. You're probably worried about
embarrassing yourself in front of your peers, but you gotta do what it
takes to get that positive evaluation. Anyway, your peers are in
the same boat as you, so if anyone laughs you can get back at them when
it's their turn.
First things first. If you are
given a choice, opt to present earlier rather than later. Yeah, that
means your due date is going to be sooner, but you won't be doing any additional
work. In fact, you can get away with less if you go first because
your professor will expect more from later groups since they've had more
time to prepare and can use previous groups as an example. Besides,
unless you make good use of the tactics I explained in the do
your work on time section, if your presentation is due two weeks later
you'll probably start working on it two weeks later than you would have
otherwise.
Now you need to prepare your speech.
Just like written assignments, oral presentations can be divided into research-
and reflective-based projects. Check my writing section
for more on how to deal with those two categories. Essentially you
could write a paper and read that as your presentation. However,
that would probably be a waste of time, to full out write a paper.
A more time-efficient technique would be to put your ideas into an outline.
Make sure to order the points in your outline in a logical matter and include
everything you feel is important to say.
The hardest part of the oral presentation
is making sure that it's the right length. Unfortunately, the only
way I know of to ensure that your report is the correct length is to practice
saying it. You could try to write a paper and then equate one page
to two minutes worth of presentation, let's say, but then you'd have to
write the paper. Once you have the outline, present it to yourself
or a friend and make sure to time yourself. Ideally you'll actually
be a minute or two under the target length, this way you have time to take
questions- professors love it if you can fend off questions. Just
like with papers, quality is more important than quantity.
However, be careful about going over the target length, some professors
will cut you off in order to get to other students and it's important to
get to your conclusion. In fact, you should really wear a watch for
these presentations so that you know if you need to hurry up.
There are a few aesthetic considerations
to keep in mind. First, it doesn't look good to be reading off a
sheet of paper, so try to memorize your notes/paper/scribblescratch.
You can have notes in front of you, but only refer to them if necessary.
Second, flexibility is important. If while you're yapping along you
think up a point that would be nice to include but isn't in your outline,
toss it out there anyway... unless you're worried about running out of
time. Be on the lookout for questions and do your best to answer
them based on your research/reflection. Third, eye contact really
does look good. You don't need to make real eye contact, I never
make eye contact with anybody and tend to talk sideways to people.
But, at least face your audience, and you can sort of look over their heads.
If your audience is too large to face all at once, rotate around so you're
facing everyone sometimes (but look towards your professor a lot).
Finally, visuals can be a huge help. If you really want you could
do a Powerpoint presentation (but make sure the classroom has the necessary
equipment) or a big ol' poster. However, I've never done either of
those because I don't know how to use Powerpoint and can't draw for my
life. Handouts are a great help, you could hand out a copy of your
outline or some relevant tables and graphs that you used. I use handouts
all the time.
Oh yeah, and try to look, you know,
decent. You're presenting yourself as well as your research/reflection,
so try not to wear that pair of pants that's more holes than material or
that shirt with the racial slur on it. See if you can do something
with that ridiculous hair of yours too.
Lastly, NEVER, NEVER be absent when
you're supposed to be doing your presentation! I mean, you'd best
be dead if you miss that session because it's practically academic suicide.
If you miss your spot you'd better be prepared to do some extra work to
make up for it, and you'll probably still have to present at some other
time of your professor's choosing.
Back to the top.
Group work
Have you ever seen one of those camp
exercises where one guy has to fall over backwards and everyone else has
to catch him, and then it's like "Yay, we all trust each other!" but then
later they all get into a fistfight? Well, group work is kind of
similar in that you are putting your faith in others that they will get
certain work done- and if they don't, you're sorta burned. This is
why group work is my least favorite kind of assignment, but there are still
some tactics you can use to help group work get done smoothly. This
section applies to the kind of group work where you're expected to meet
outside of class and put together some kind of project, not the kind where
you spend half the class period talking about the movie you saw last night,
how much you've been drinking, and how far behind in your classes you are
and then spurt out some off-the-top-of-your-head answer to the rest of
the class.
Group work will be oh so much easier
if you're in a group with people you can trust, so if you get to choose
your group look for friends or classmates you've worked well with before.
Make sure that you get some contact info as soon after the group is formed
as possible- phone number, email, residence, mailing address, credit card
information, whatever, it's all good. This way you can pester your
group members into agreeing to meet with you.
Setting up a meeting is the next step.
It's important to determine exactly what your project entails as early
as possible. This way you know what has to be done and you can divide
the labor. I find that group work functions best if each member of
the group is solely responsible for his own part, and then later you'll
come back and fit it all together. If you try to collaborate on each
part you're going to need to spend more time meeting and making sure you're
all on the same page. Ideally the group can meet once shortly after
the group's formation to divide up the work, then a second time a few days
before the deadline so you can make sure everyone's ok and that the pieces
fit. This way you can make the necessary changes to each piece and
still have some time left to pick up the slack for those lazy people.
Between those two meetings you can send
your partners email or something to make sure they haven't fallen off the
face of the Earth. If you start to feel as though other group members
are not pulling their weight, let your professor know what's going on.
Remember, your professor doesn't know what everyone in the group has done
and is likely to judge the group as a whole. If one of your partners
doesn't do his job and you don't give your professor a heads up, that poor
job could be reflected in your evaluation. Like with anything else,
try to give your professor fair notice. Don't tell him the day of
the presentation that you won't have that required poster because the guy
responsible for it was visited by the nice men in the white coats.
Don't try to do the project yourself
either, that's sure to be a ton of work. Otherwise it would just
be an independant project. You need to trust that your partners will
do their work, and you can check up on them, but don't do their job.
At the same time, make sure that you're doing your job. If the group
work is based on something you were all supposed to read, it would be a
good idea for you to read the article before the first meeting and be prepared
to work with it. If you haven't done your own preparation then you're
in no position to expect that anyone else in the group has. The same
goes for any other work delegated to you.
Back to the top.
Take care of yourself
I know, I know, you've heard this one
from a million and two different places, but that's because it's true.
The fact of the matter is, if you're exhausted because the last time you
slept was when you were still in high school, you're not going to get your
best work done. Even the no-think method I discuss in the section
on how to write doesn't work if you're too tired.
I guess maybe just a little thinking is involved.
You want to make sure you get enough
sleep. Some people claim they can get by with five hours of sleep
or even less, and if you're one of those people I envy you. Most
people need more like eight hours, and some need more than that.
That's eight or more hours of being asleep, mind you, not eight hours of
being in bed wishing to be asleep. Be honest with yourself and sleep
when you need to. If you manage to space your work out evenly each
day (including weekends) you won't need to do any of those evil all-nighters.
Check the section on how to do your work on time for more
info on getting work done during the day. By the way, if you need
more than ten hours of sleep each night you might want to go see a doctor.
Eating is important too. I'm not
even talking about a balanced diet, though all the power to you if you
have the will power to keep that up. I'm just talking about eating
on a regular basis. You shouldn't need to skip meals in favor of
class, homework, or anything else. You don't need a full breakfast
with two eggs and two pieces of toast and a thick slice of ham, you just
need to grab something. An apple and a banana can make a good breakfast,
and they're easy to sneak out of Saga. Then you can have a larger
lunch or maybe have a mid-morning snack. But do eat something, if
you don't it will be hard to write that early morning paper or pay attention
in that 9:00 class.
Some people like to exercise and such
to stay in shape. That's all well and good, but personally I don't
recommend it. Whenever I exercise I get tired and then I want to
relax rather than do papers or read stuff. Relaxing may not be the
best use of your time considering you already used a bunch of time to exercise
and maybe you even showered too, if you're in to that kind of thing.
I guess my advice here is to exercise enough to get those endorphins going,
but not to the point of exhaustion. Exactly how long this means for
your workout session depends on your exercise activity of choice and how
physically fit you are. Me, I might be able to do some exercise for
fifteen minutes without knocking myself out. Better make it ten to
be safe.
Remember to take fun breaks for yourself
too. You're probably doing enough of this already, but working day
and night is sure to cause you stress, it may even make you depressed.
If you've divided your assignments well you should be able to find some
time for recreation every day. Of course, if you leave your work
to the last minute, that's when you get those stressful days at the end
of the semester when you don't have time to blink. Not good.
Oh, and at all costs, do remember to
breathe. This guy who lived in my hall last year once forgot to breathe
because he was doing so much work... it wasn't pretty.
Back to the top.
Make a good last
impression
Do you remember what I wrote about making
a good first impression? I could have practically copied that section and
pasted it here. The last part of the semester, particularily the
last week or two after Thanksgiving and spring breaks, are likely to stick
in your professor's mind. The idea is to start off on a good foot
and end on one as well. If you do that it's not so important what
you did in between. In fact, a strong finish after a not-so-good
middle period looks like improvement, which is highly valued here at Hampshire.
So, just like with the first few sessions, make sure to show up to the
last few on time, make an extra effort to participate in class, and do
your best on your final paper. You can try smiling too. Looking
like a nice person never hurt anyone.
Back to the top.
Self-evaluations
save all
Many a student have been taken by surprise
by these things, which always manage to be remembered during the last week
of classes, on top of final projects no less. Do not forsake the
self-evaluation, as a well-written SE can right many wrongs. Now,
if you couldn't be bothered to show up for class more than five times,
and that one comment you made in class that time caused a five-minute silence
it was so bad, and you were supposed to do an oral report on the waggle
dance in honey bees but instead you discussed why Lemmy is the coolest,
well, the self-evaluation isn't going to save you... although, your professor
is sure to have enjoyed that oral presentation. But, if you're sort
of borderline between positive and negative evaluations, or if you want
an even stronger positive eval, the self-evaluation can be your best friend.
Now, you want to start off slow with
a brief summary of the course. Spend a paragraph talking about the
main objectives and conclusions, and then list the most important readings.
If you had to buy some books, list those. If you just got a packet
or something, choose a few major readings to put down. This is the
boring part of the self-eval, but it makes it look like you actually know
what the class was about.
Start off the second the paragraph by
vaguely referring to the important assignments that students were expected
to complete. Final projects, midterm projects, oral presentations,
and group projects can all be considered important and worthy of mentioning.
Next you want to spend the rest of this paragraph and all of the next one
talking about what you specifically did. What was your final project
about, and what did you conclude? Remind your professor how stunning
that oral presentation was, and how your group really went all out.
The fourth and last paragraph can discuss
lingering details about those important projects or small classroom details.
If you participated often or had consistant attendance, be sure to remind
your professor of that here. This paragraph is also where you sum
up your case for why you deserve a positive evaluation. Your last
sentence should be "Although some improvement is necessary, overall I feel
my work is deserving of a positive evaluation for this course." It's
important that you don't lie about any of your achievements. If you
talk about how often you participated but in reality the only time you
opened your mouth during class was when you let out that huge belch, you
could get caught in a lie and burned.
The trick with self-evaluations is that
you want to look brilliant, but you also want to look modest and as though
you've seriously been considering your progress. Therefore, you need
to make sure to mention at least one negative thing about your work and,
at the same time, play it down by making it look not so bad. This
way your professor will think you have honestly considered how you've done,
but your faults look negligible. Here are some examples of faults
and playing them down:
Lack of participation: "I wish I had
participated more often in class. However, when I did offer comments
I feel they were very inciteful."
Short final paper: "Although my final
paper is shorter than I had hoped, I believe that it is thorough and well-written,
and that additional information would not significantly increase its quality."
Poor final paper: "I found my final
paper difficult to write because this is the first time I have been asked
to write using this style. However, I feel as though I learned a
lot during the course of the semester and am confident that I will perform
better on similar projects in the future."
Poor group project: "My group had trouble
piecing together our project. Nevertheless I feel that my poster/presentation/sound
effects accurately reflect(s) my effort and understanding of the material
and that the project, as a whole, adequately conveyed the material/suggested
our creativity/caused all chaos to break loose."
You can make up a mildly negative statement
for whatever else you want as well. You can also feel free to tailor
the above quotes to your needs. It is fine to have more negative
comment in your paper as they can cover up that botched oral presentation
or generally short projects. Make sure to put in one of these statements
even if you can't think of any faults. You probably did make one
somewhere, and you want to look modest rather than arrogant.
Self-evaluations should be as close
to one full page in length as possible, not too much longer or too much
shorter. They should be single-spaced so you can squeeze a lot into
one page, but put a blank line between each paragraph so it looks nice.
You don't want a really short self-eval because then it kind of looks like
maybe you didn't do anything worth mentioning. If you need to, write
a little more about that final paper or you could even expand your summary
of the course. If your self-evaluation is too long you'll start to
bore your professor, so it's gets to be over a page and a quarter or so,
try to trim some stuff off. Or use a smaller font.
Back to the top.
Conclusion
If you do your best to follow the steps
I have laid out, it is my honest belief that you will indeed be able to
easily earn positive evaluations in your Hampshire courses. Before
long, you too could be raking in the positive evals! So get out there,
and good luck!
Questions? Comments? Want
me to destroy this document because it's revealing Hampshire's darkest
secrets? Send me email!
Back to the top. |